Michael Davis and Kelly Laas sign the first ProGReSS publication

We are proud to announce the first published scientific paper outcome from the ProGReSS project.

MDavis-IITKelly-Laas-IIT   ‘‘Broader Impacts’’ or ‘‘Responsible Research and Innovation’’? A Comparison of Two Criteria for Funding Research in Science and Engineering

Prof. Michael Davis and Kelly Laas, from the Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), have just published an original research paper in the Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics. This paper, entitled ‘‘Broader Impacts’’ or ‘‘Responsible Research and Innovation’’? A Comparison of Two Criteria for Funding Research in Science and Engineering‘‘Broader Impacts’’ or ‘‘Responsible Research and Innovation’’? A Comparison of Two Criteria for Funding Research in Science and Engineering, provides a thorough comparison of the normative frameworks for research funding currently put forward on both sides of the Atlantic. Their analysis explores potential complementarities as well as convergence.

A pre-print version of the article can be accessed here. 

A copy of the article is available for purchase here.

Article abstract:

Our subject is how the experience of Americans with a certain funding criterion, “broader impacts” (and some similar criteria) may help in efforts to turn the European concept of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) into a useful guide to funding Europe’s scientific and technical research. We believe this comparison may also be as enlightening for Americans concerned with revising research policy. We have organized our report around René Von Schomberg’s definition of RRI, since it seems both to cover what the European research group to which we belong is interested in and to be the only widely accepted definition of RRI. According to Von Schomberg, RRI: “… is a transparent, interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view to the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its marketable products (in order to allow a proper embedding of scientific and technological advances in our society).” While RRI seeks fundamental changes in the way research is conducted, Broader Impacts is more concerned with more peripheral aspects of research: widening participation of disadvantaged groups, recruiting the next generation of scientists, increasing the speed with which results are used, and so on. Nevertheless, an examination of the broadening of funding criteria over the last four decades suggests that National Science Foundation has been moving in the direction of RRI.

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9480-1